What is the burden of proof in a product liability claim?

How the answer differs across 4 jurisdictions

European UnionFull article
The Short Answer

In the EU, the burden of proof in product liability claims generally falls on the injured person, but the manufacturer must prove certain defences — such as that the defect did not exist when the product was put into circulation.

1985
Directive year
Strict liabilit
Liability type
10 years
Limitation period
Producer
Liable party
The Short Answer

Under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, the claimant must prove the product was defective and caused damage; the manufacturer does not have to prove it was safe.

Claimant
Who bears burden
s. 4(1)
Relevant section
Balance of proo
Standard of proof
Strict liabilit
Liability type
The Short Answer

Under Japan’s Product Liability Act, manufacturers can avoid liability by proving the defect did not exist when the product was delivered, the claimant’s negligence caused or contributed to the damage, or the state of scientific/technical knowledge at the time made the defect undiscoverable.

10 years
Statute of repose
3 years
Limitation period
Article 4
PL Act defense provisions
2009
Act effective year
AustraliaFull article
The Short Answer

Yes, you may be able to claim damages under the Australian Consumer Law if the implanted medical device was unsafe, defective, or failed to meet consumer guarantees.

6 years
Limitation period
$100k+
Compensation cap
ACL s. 54
Consumer guarantee
s. 138
Strict liability

Read Full Articles

Not legal advice. This article is general information based on publicly available sources, written for educational purposes. Laws change and individual situations vary. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before acting on anything you read here. Last reviewed: June 2026.