US-California

What are the exceptions to at-will employment in California?

4 main exceptio
Categories
FEHA
Key law
Lab. Code § 292
At-will default
2 years
Typical breach claim deadline
The Short Answer

California’s at-will employment rule has key exceptions: express or implied contracts, public policy violations, statutory protections (e.g., anti-discrimination laws), and covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

What the Law Says

California Labor Code § 2922 establishes the default rule that employment is at-will — but courts and statutes recognize important limits.

Under California law, most employment relationships are 'at-will,' meaning either employer or employee may end the relationship at any time, with or without cause or notice — unless an exception applies.

The primary statutory foundation is Labor Code § 2922: 'An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other.' However, this rule is not absolute.

Statutory exceptions include protections under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Labor Code provisions prohibiting retaliation (e.g., for whistleblowing or wage complaints), and leave laws like the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Courts have also recognized common law exceptions — notably termination in violation of public policy, breach of an implied-in-fact contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Statutory Text

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other.

Labor Code § 2922

What Courts Have Said

California courts have carved out well-established common law exceptions to at-will employment, grounded in fairness and public policy.

Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
California Supreme Court · 1980

Recognized the public policy exception: employers cannot fire employees for refusing to commit illegal acts or for exercising legal rights (e.g., filing a workers’ comp claim).

Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.
California Supreme Court · 2000

Confirmed that implied-in-fact contracts and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing can limit at-will terminations — but emphasized that such claims require clear evidence beyond general job security assurances.

What to Do

1

Review your written or oral employment agreement for terms limiting at-will status (e.g., 'for cause only' language or progressive discipline policies).

2

Document any adverse action tied to protected activity (e.g., reporting safety violations, requesting medical leave, or opposing discrimination).

3

File a complaint with the DFEH within one year for FEHA-based claims, or with the Labor Commissioner for wage-related retaliation (within 6 months to 3 years, depending on claim type).

4

Consult an employment attorney promptly — many wrongful termination claims have short statutes of limitations (e.g., 2 years for breach of implied contract under Code of Civil Procedure § 339).

Sources

Not legal advice. This article is general information based on publicly available sources, written for educational purposes. Laws change and individual situations vary. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before acting on anything you read here. Last reviewed: 2026-06-08.