US-California

How do I terminate an easement on my property?

Written release
Required for express termination
20 years
Abandonment presumption period
Same owner
Merger requirement
No use + intent
Abandonment standard
The Short Answer

You can terminate an easement in California by express release, expiration, merger of ownership, abandonment, or necessity ending — but courts require clear evidence for abandonment.

What the Law Says

California law recognizes several legal methods to terminate an easement. The most common and reliable is an express written release, but other doctrines like merger, expiration, and abandonment also apply — each with strict requirements.

An easement can be terminated by express release: the holder signs a written document releasing the easement, which must be recorded in the county where the burdened property lies to be effective against later purchasers.

Termination by merger occurs when the same person acquires both the dominant and servient estates — i.e., owns both the benefited and burdened properties. Once unified, the easement ceases automatically, unless preserved by express reservation.

Abandonment requires both nonuse *and* unequivocal acts demonstrating intent to abandon — mere nonuse for 20 years creates only a rebuttable presumption of abandonment under Civil Code § 813.

Easements appurtenant (attached to land) do not expire automatically, but easements in gross or those created for a specific purpose may terminate when that purpose ends or the time limit expires.

Statutory Text

An easement is extinguished whenever the dominant and the servient tenement come into the same ownership.

Civil Code § 812 — Extinguishment by merger
Statutory Text

The owner of any interest in real property… may record a document… declaring that the easement has been abandoned.

Civil Code § 813(a) — Abandonment declaration
Statutory Text

A prescriptive easement is extinguished by nonuse for a period of five years.

Civil Code § 813(b) — Prescriptive easement termination

What Courts Have Said

California courts emphasize that termination — especially by abandonment — requires more than just disuse. Intent must be clear, deliberate, and objectively demonstrated.

Moores v. Walsh
California Court of Appeal · 2017

The court held that 30 years of nonuse alone was insufficient to prove abandonment; there must be ‘positive acts’ showing intent to relinquish the easement, such as blocking access or executing a release.

Duff v. Spreckels
California Supreme Court · 1915

Confirmed that merger terminates an easement automatically when one party holds both estates — no formal act is needed, though recording a disclaimer helps avoid future disputes.

What to Do

1

Obtain a written, notarized release from the easement holder and record it with the county recorder.

2

If you own both parcels, confirm merger occurred — then record a notice of extinguishment under Civil Code § 812.

3

For abandonment: gather evidence of 20+ years of nonuse *plus* clear acts showing intent (e.g., fencing, demolition of access path, written statements).

4

File a quiet title action if the easement holder disputes termination — a court order will resolve uncertainty.

5

Consult a real estate attorney before acting, especially for prescriptive or historic easements, which have unique rules.

Sources

Not legal advice. This article is general information based on publicly available sources, written for educational purposes. Laws change and individual situations vary. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before acting on anything you read here. Last reviewed: 2026-06-08.