Canada

Are online terms of use clickwrap agreements enforceable as binding contracts?

Reasonable noti
Key requirement
Clear assent
Essential element
2007 SCC 34
Dell case
2017 SCC 33
Douez case
The Short Answer

Yes, online clickwrap agreements can be enforceable in Canada if users have reasonable notice of the terms and manifest clear assent — but courts closely scrutinize them in consumer contexts, especially forum selection or arbitration clauses.

What the Law Says

Canadian contract law requires offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to create legal relations. For online terms, enforceability turns on whether the user had adequate notice and voluntarily agreed — especially where the contract is one of adhesion.

Clickwrap agreements — where users must click 'I agree' to proceed — are generally enforceable in Canada if the terms are reasonably communicated and the user’s assent is unambiguous.

However, courts treat standard-form consumer contracts (‘contracts of adhesion’) with heightened scrutiny. Clauses that deprive consumers of rights — like mandatory arbitration or foreign forum selection — may be unenforceable unless the business demonstrates fair process and transparency.

No single federal statute governs online contract formation; instead, provincial contract law (e.g., common law in most provinces, Civil Code in Quebec) applies. The Supreme Court has emphasized fairness, inequality of bargaining power, and the nature of rights at stake.

What Courts Have Said

The Supreme Court of Canada has repeatedly held that online terms — even in clickwrap form — are not automatically binding. Enforceability depends on procedural fairness, notice, and the consumer’s ability to understand and reject the terms.

Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs
Supreme Court of Canada · 2007

The Court found that an arbitration clause buried in website terms was unenforceable against Quebec consumers because it lacked sufficient visibility and did not meet the Civil Code’s requirement for external clauses to be ‘brought to the attention’ of the party beforehand.

Douez v. Facebook, Inc.
Supreme Court of Canada · 2017

The Court refused to enforce Facebook’s California forum selection clause in its Terms of Use, holding that consumers’ constitutional and privacy rights outweighed contractual convenience — especially given gross inequality of bargaining power and lack of meaningful choice.

What to Do

1

Ensure terms are visible before the 'I agree' step — e.g., scrollable text or prominent link with clear language.

2

Use active, unambiguous assent (e.g., unchecked box requiring click — not pre-checked).

3

Avoid burying key clauses (arbitration, jurisdiction, liability limits) — highlight them separately if possible.

4

For Quebec users, comply with Civil Code art. 1435: external clauses must be expressly brought to the consumer’s attention.

5

Review terms regularly to ensure fairness, readability, and compliance with evolving case law.

Sources

Not legal advice. This article is general information based on publicly available sources, written for educational purposes. Laws change and individual situations vary. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before acting on anything you read here. Last reviewed: 2026-06-08.