US-New York

How does comparative negligence work in New York personal injury cases?

Pure system
Negligence type
No 50% bar
Fault threshold
1% recovery
Minimum recovery
Jury apportions
Who assigns fault
The Short Answer

In New York, comparative negligence means your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault — even if you’re 99% at fault, you can still recover 1% of damages.

What the Law Says

New York follows a 'pure' comparative negligence rule, meaning fault is divided among all parties, and your damages are reduced by your share — no matter how large.

New York law allows injured people to recover damages even when they are mostly at fault. Unlike some states that block recovery if you’re more than 50% responsible, New York imposes no such cutoff.

A jury (or judge in a bench trial) must determine the percentage of fault for each party involved — plaintiff, defendant(s), and sometimes non-parties whose conduct contributed to the injury.

Once percentages are assigned, the court reduces the total damages awarded to the plaintiff by their own percentage of fault. For example, if you’re found 30% at fault and total damages are $100,000, you receive $70,000.

Statutory Text

In any action to recover damages for personal injury, property damage or death, the culpable conduct of the claimant shall not bar recovery, but the amount of damages otherwise recoverable shall be diminished in proportion to the claimant's culpable conduct.

New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) § 1411 — Comparative negligence

What Courts Have Said

New York courts consistently uphold the plain language of CPLR § 1411, emphasizing that plaintiffs retain the right to recover regardless of high fault percentages.

Denny v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of New York · 1995

The Court confirmed that CPLR § 1411 abolished the common-law doctrine of contributory negligence and replaced it with pure comparative fault — rejecting any judicially imposed threshold like a 50% bar.

Arbegast v. Board of Education
Court of Appeals of New York · 1985

The Court held that comparative fault applies even when the plaintiff’s conduct involves a statutory violation, as long as it contributed to the injury — reinforcing the statute’s broad application.

What to Do

1

Gather evidence showing how the other party’s actions caused or contributed to your injury.

2

Preserve all records (photos, witness statements, medical reports) that may help dispute claims of your fault.

3

Work with your attorney to challenge inflated fault percentages the defense may argue.

4

Prepare for trial testimony or settlement negotiations where fault allocation will be central.

5

Remember: even if you’re found highly at fault, you’re still entitled to a proportional recovery under New York law.

Sources

Same Question, Other Jurisdictions

Not legal advice. This article is general information based on publicly available sources, written for educational purposes. Laws change and individual situations vary. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before acting on anything you read here. Last reviewed: 2026-06-08.